Letter MIT Technology Review Spectrum
To:
“Mr. Jason Pontin, Editor in Chief and Publisher, MIT
Technology Review” Jason.Pontin @technologyreview.com,
“Editor in Chief and Publisher, MIT SPECTRUM” spectrum @mit.edu
“Editor in Chief and Publisher, MIT SPECTRUM” spectrum @mit.edu
Subject
Article Submission: How Scientists, Engineers, and Scholars of
Empire Subvert Both Science and Religion in the Service of Empire
Date: June 19, 2014
Dear
Editors,
Enclosed
please find my article submission. I would like to believe that in
your wisdom to foster insightful discussions and accurate awareness
about science and technology and its impact on society, you would see
fit to reprint this submission in some column or other in both MIT
Technology Review and MIT Spectrum. I sometimes read the former, and
recently had the opportunity to glance at the Spring 2014 issue of
the latter. I can barely prevent myself from hitting my already sore
head on the nearest wall at the banality of evil among the top
scientists and scholars in the United States; at their cowardly
silence before intellectual integrity; at their blind pursuit of
scientific passions to the detriment of society and its war-mongering
police-state constructions; being so ardently fostered at the highest
institution of scientific and technological learning in the world. I
hope I may be forgiven to think that both these publications appear
to be underwriting the cheer-leading and selling of technological
innovations from America's peerless academy as part of its
military-industrial-academic complex, rather than underwriting any
objective intellectual effort at understanding the real forces
driving the funding of these innovations: the quest for primacy and
hegemony in a super-militarized global scientific dictatorship. MIT
is helping to build that scientific dystopia without a murmur of
protest or display of conscience coming from its developers. Willing
compliance with silence is rewarded with glowing tributes to their
scientific acumen and achievements.
Hannah
Arendt, under the rubric of victor's justice, had called that ugly
compliance with the amoral imperatives of power and hegemony, of
obedience to authority, the Banality of Evil. Several professors at
MIT during my time there, had impressed me as the foremost moral
scholars of America who, at least at the time during the declining
peak of the Cold War, had appeared to me to have excelled in
demonstrating intellectual integrity for uncovering past crimes
against humanity, of both their own government, as well as others,
but mainly the enemy governments. The same scholars, scientists and
professors today are either pathetically silent before the travesty
befalling their own nation, never mind the world, or spinning
doctrinal garbage which ultimately assists in that very exercise of
travesty in the guise of displaying moral certitude. Scientific and
moral integrity is evidently not a great virtue taught and rewarded
at MIT, an institution which since its inception has been funded by
empire in service of empire. This is amply demonstrated, for
instance, in the Spring 2014 Issue of MIT Spectrum where none of the
featured scientists are quoted for the display of their moral
gravitas or comprehension of the impact of their scientific quests on
creating a dystopic society any differently from the scientists and
technologists of the Third Reich, all of whom, incidentally, were
brought over to America to lead its science and technology in the now
declassified operation known as Operation Paperclip.
Specifically,
when the exercise of integrity and display of morality intersects
with imperial mobilization, just as during the Third Reich before the
authority of Mein Führer, all self-servingly appear to fall in
line United We Stand with the narratives of power today. None
dare display even a tiny bit of courageous thinking outside the box
of the narratives at the moment when it is most crucial to do so.
That is often all that is required to say no to the bullshit when
saying such timely no can actually make an impact in averting the
fait accompli which their silence ensures.
Was
it really any different in the Third Reich? Just as the Jews lamented
in the aftermath of World War II of why they remained so cowardly
silent through the scientific tyranny of the Third Reich, a topic I
learned in great depth at MIT, I wish to spare myself that
traditional ex post facto lament by boldly voicing that concern now.
Please
read the factual and analytical piece that follows, get some MIT
structural scientists to critique it if you wish, and make a judgment
of your own whether the exercise of scholarship and intellectual
integrity at MIT in fact permits the publication of factual analysis
that goes against the war-mongering imperial grain that largely funds
this institution. It is trivial, ex post facto, to offer
demonstrations of high-mindedness as the former President of MIT,
who, after presiding over the buildup of the same militarized
society, upon retirement from the top academic post in the most
militarized country on earth, thought it most conscionable to make
the following banal statement of moral clarity:
“This
irrational behavior is only possible because we, the citizens of the
nation, permit it. It is no longer a question of controlling a
military-industrial complex, but rather, of keeping the United States
from becoming a totally military culture.” — The United
States: A militarized society, Jerome B. Wiesner, president emeritus
MIT, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, August 1985, pg. 104
JBW's
biography reads as follows, just in case today's generation of
scientists and students at MIT remain unfamiliar with this science
iconoclast who discovered his conscience a tad too late:
“Jerome
B. Wiesner (May 30, 1915 – October 21, 1994), was associated
with MIT for most of his career, joining the MIT Radiation Laboratory
in 1942 and working on radar development. He worked briefly at Los
Alamos, returned to become a professor of Electrical Engineering at
MIT, and worked at and ultimately became director of the Research
Laboratory of Electronics at MIT (RLE). He became Dean of the School
of Science in 1964, Provost in 1966, and President from 1971 to 1980.
He was also elected a life member of the MIT Corporation.” —
Wikipedia
I
would hope that scientists and technologists of genuine integrity
might endeavor to put a stop to such disingenuous ex post facto
display of meaningless morality which cost little to utter, if
anything at all, besides looking great in publications and in
obituary notices to confer posthumous sainthood.
The
time is now. The hour is today. Not tomorrow, not after retirement,
or under victor's justice.
Sincerely,
Zahir
Ebrahim
Project
Humanbeingsfirst.org
California
Enclosure
FAQ: Prove that 9/11 narrative is a Big Lie, URL:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2014/06/wtc-7-demolition-and-big-lie-of-911.html
Source
URL:
http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2014/06/letter-mit-technology-review-spectrum.html
Letter
MIT Technology Review and MIT SPECTRUM Magazines By Zahir Ebrahim
The Plebeian antidote to Hectoring Hegemons
Home
is Humanbeingsfirst.org
Okay
to copy, print, or post this document;
verbatim reproduction only.
Comment here. Full Copyright Notice here.
Comment here. Full Copyright Notice here.
Project Humanbeingsfirst Print Archive
-
▼
2014
(26)
- ► August 2014 (1)
- ► April 2014 (5)
- ► March 2014 (2)
- ► February 2014 (6)
- ► January 2014 (6)
© Zahir Ebrahim. Verbatim reproduction license at http://humanbeingsfirst.org#Copyright. Ethereal template. Powered by Blogger.